wizardofaws

Archive for the ‘Government Reforms’ Category

Syrian Refugees lodged in Congressional Districts that vote for them

In Executive order, Government Reforms, Obama, President obamas Cabinet, Terrorists on November 22, 2015 at 7:08 pm

Syrian Refugees lodged in Congressional Districts that vote for them, yes not one refugee in a district who’s house member votes no!

Term limits? Lets see what happens when San Fransisco gets thousands of gay bashers living in the city by the bay.  Don’t like how the slut is dressed feel free to beat the living crap of out anyone one they disagree with.  Yes this will go over well with the female population of a free American City.

Obama is going to force millions of refugee’s on the American Public, he has been overheard using the Million Number.  He won’t say it publicly but lets just say he brings in one hundred thousand.  Where will they live?  Who is going to pay for them?  Why are American’s being asked to give free services to a new population when Veterans are begging for money, housing, food and help on the streets of America a country they already served?

Syrian Refugees lodged in Congressional Districts that vote for them, how will your congressional Representative vote?  Nancy Pelosi thinks we should bring them in, let her house them in her districts.  The killing of openly gay people will become common place when Sharia law takes over the city.

Syrian Refugees lodged in Congressional Districts that vote for them and how they vote will determine how the American Public will vote in the next election.  Obama has a plan, and we are going to have to live with the consequences of his secret plans for decades to come.   The American Public is not getting all the facts of the wave of people that have invaded Europe.  When you see young girls getting beaten for what they are wearing ( a personal choice) that is not in the image of what a member of the Muslim faith agrees with, they beat, kick and harm her.   The count of reported Rapes is up across the European Continent. So our solution is to bring more of the refugees here?  To America!

Syrian Refugees lodged in Congressional Districts that vote for them would challenge each member of Congress to determine what he or she believes to be be best for their own districts.  Make sure they stay here.  Is Wisconsin ready for a few thousand new supported members of their state?  If Paul Ryan believes they belong in this country let them live in his Neighborhood.  Attend school with his children.  Drive through his home town.  Lets see if he as Speaker of the house is happy about the opinion of the refugees about the choice of dress of his daughters.   How many refugee’s children will we put in the same School with President Obama’s Daughters? How many refugee’s will be place in Washington D.C. or Chicago?

Syrian Refugees lodged in Congressional Districts that vote for them and we will see how many will live on Nancy Pelosi’s Street.  Home Town, or Neighborhood.

Syrian Refugees lodged in Congressional Districts that vote for them would bring term limits faster than all the money spent trying to remove bad politicians in American History.  Be careful for what you wish, for it may all come true, Hope and Change.

Will the Next William Borah Please stand up

In Executive order, Government Reforms, Obama, Terrorists on July 23, 2015 at 3:31 pm

Will the Next William Borah please stand up, known as the “Lion of Idaho” during his 33 years in the United States Senate. Elected as a Republican in 1907, Borah established himself as a prominent progressive with a fiercely independent spirit. This superb orator who had a knack for courting publicity was once named by Time magazine as the “most famed senator of the century.” Despite his leading role in the creation of two constitutional amendments–establishing the graduated income tax and the 17th amendment – Borah is best remembered for his impact on American foreign policy. In 1917, he was instrumental in the Senate’s rejection of American entry into the League of Nations.

The League of Nations was considered Woodrow Wilson’s singular achievement and the entire world watched as Wilson attempted to get the treaty through the US Senate.

Alice Roosevelt Longworth who was married to Nick Longworth the Speaker of the House started informal gatherings which became outright meetings of destruction of the Treaty.

The League of Nations treaty was considered a bad deal for America by the Senate giving the League a virtual vote over the soverity of the Untied States.  Wilson who was basically a socialist loved the idea of the world council voting on world affairs.  Today the United Nations fills this void, which was pushed into being by Eleanor Roosevelt who was in agreement with Wilson. Ironically Eleanor was a cousin of Alice Roosevelt Longworth who was the daughter of Theodore Roosevelt.

In January 1940, Borah suffered a brain hemorrhage and died. His funeral service was held in the U.S. Senate Chamber.  

It was Borah who stood in the Senate Chamber and lobbied his fellow Senators to veto the bad treaty.  Much like the Iran Deal that Secretary of State Kerry has put forward.  President Obama has threatened a Veto, but when does the Administration get to tell the Congress how things are going to be.

We need a Senator Borah to take the lead.  Are there any Senators who are Statesman left in the United States Senate?  We will soon find out.

Will the Next William Borah Please Stand up: if there is one!

First Dude Bubba Clinton

In Dollar Crisis, Government Reforms, Hillary Clinton on June 1, 2015 at 2:57 pm

In the remote possibility that Hillary Clinton were to become President of the Untied States of American, and William Jefferson Clinton where to become First Dude or 2nd President of the Untied States of the East Wing.  And in that remote possibility and unthinkable challenge that he were to keep doing the good works of the Clinton Foundation, so forth and so on…

With that premise if Bill Clinton received 150 thousand dollars when his wife as a United States Senator for each speech delivered.  And with the knowledge that they the Clinton family and not the foundation need money, but as a spouse of a Secretary of State the value of a speech is 500 thousand to 750 thousand US Dollars.  What would the value of a speech and event appearance of the First Dude of the United States of America be worth?

According to the web site Who’s on my money http://www.whosonmymoney.com the first presidential couple to appear on US Currency together was George and Martha Washington.  Hillary as President would not choose to place herself on American Currency during her administration.  Or would she? hillary-clinton.w529.h282.2x

The Women on 20 didn’t even vote for Hillary Clinton, although as President she would get a Golden Dollar Coin made in her honor.

If Bill “Bubba” Clinton where the First Dude of the United States and it cost millions of dollars donated to the Hillary for President Campaign to get access or favors then it seems logical it is cheaper to invite Bill to speak and pay the fees for direct access.    But what would that cost?  George Stephanopoulos was offended by the book Clinton Cash that the author Peter Schweizer didn’t have Facts about them stealing or moving money for personal gain. When Hillary’s Brother took money to get direct access to Bill as President it was less than a quarter million.  Bill should be worth alot more.

This is where free market capitalism will work to it’s best.  Let the Free Market decide how much Bill can charge for an appearance and if they need a little extra they can just pay for it.

When a Politician gets it wrong

In Climate Change, Dollar Crisis, Government Reforms, President obamas Cabinet, Presidential Campaign on May 9, 2015 at 5:20 pm

When a Politician gets it wrong unless it happens during an election year, there are no consequences for that individual.  The taxpayers get the tab.

During the 70’s the USGS announced that the San Andres Fault was pushing up.  Millions of dollars were spent following the rise of the fault line and people were encouraged to prepare for the “Big One” as all of California waited for the next giant earthquake to split California in two.  Earthquakes are serious buisness, and being prepared is a good thing but the hysteria that followed was almost comical looking back.  One day someone looked at the equipment, and noticed that for years they had been making a simple calculation mistake.  We were not inching up after all.  In fact the fault had not moved in over a 150 years.  Another problem all together but the hysteria was over.  Climate change reminds me of this story.  As we are hyped into believing that if we don’t spend more on a particular politicians solution the oceans will rise and we will all die from green house gas.  How it’s my SUV that are responsible and not Washington’s use of Boeing Jets that needs to be curtailed I will never understand.

When a Politician gets it wrong we have to pay the price for their lack of understanding of Science and general thought.  Each Politician get to remedy the situation based on how it effects there district.

When a Politician gets it wrong once they retire from Washington they collect their money, as if they earned a cushy retirement.  We the taxpayers get to pay the ultimate price.

When a Politician gets it wrong we all suffer.  Let us count the ways.  Social Security is insolvent, yet they don’t have to have it work, because they are not relying on it to survive in their retirement.  We could fix that as voters and taxpayers if we just had the will.  Global Warming alarmist have been wrong for years and now we call it “Climate Change” because it didn’t get warm.  Or maybe we should just call it by it old name, “Weather” .    Yet the U.N. wants full control of the world under this new fear.  Unfortunately President Obama loves this idea, so instead of stopping the insanity we are going to spend taxpayer funds on this fallacy.  If the world does heat up, it will cool it self off as it has for millions of years.

When a Politician gets it wrong they are allowed to borrow money, from us the taxpayers to buy into the stock market and sell bonds for fund their lack of foresight.  If you buy a stock and it goes down you lose money.  When a Politician does it in your name, they leave you and I or us holding the bag.  Detroit should be enough to scare everyone, Stockton CA  or Orange County, California.  Yet they are doing it again.

When a Politician gets it wrong, they force the general public into Obama care and exempt themselves.  How many would take back there vote today?

When a Politician gets it wrong we pay and they move on.

When a Politician gets it wrong they just lie to us and themselves.

 

If the White House couldn’t tell…

In Government Reforms, Iran on March 26, 2015 at 4:57 pm

If the White House couldn’t tell that Bowe Bergdahl was a traitor why should the American People trust the White House on the Iran Deal?

If the White House couldn’t tell that the Arab Spring would cause a middle east melt down, why should the American People trust the White House on the Iranian deal being worked out now?

If the White House couldn’t tell that closing Guantanamo Bay is a bad idea and trading five terrorists for one traitor (alleged by every soldier who served with him, but innocent till proven guilty) why should be trust the White House on the Iran Deal?

If the White House couldn’t tell that a video didn’t cause the death in Benghazi of our Ambassador why should we trust them to know a good deal with Iran?

If the White House couldn’t tell that Susan Rice was wrong or Lying when she blamed everyone but Barack Obama on TV why should the American People trust the Obama Administration on an Iran Deal?

If the White House couldn’t tell that refusing to meet with our ally in the Middle East, Bibi Netanyahu as the leader of a democracy in the Middle East and our friend Israel, why should we trust them on the Iran Deal?  It was OK however to secretly work to help his opposition and meet with him before the election.  Essential lying to the American People.

If the White House couldn’t tell that the Iranian Leader Ali Khamenei shouting Death to America is ok, but we should trust the White House to create a deal where they can produce a Nuclear Weapon is OK.  Why should any American Trust the Obama Administration and John Kerry to produce a good deal?

If the White House couldn’t tell that George W Bush shouldn’t be blamed for everything that doesn’t go their way is a bad idea how can the American People Trust them to get a deal with Iran.

If the White House couldn’t tell Americans that the Senate would be able to approve any deal with Iran when ready to sign, but tell our Senators that they don’t have a say, even though the Constitution demands it.  Why should we trust John Kerry or President Obama.

If the White House couldn’t tell Candy Crowley that she was incorrect when she interjected herself in a Presidential Election, why should the American People Trust the White House on an Iran Deal?

If the White House couldn’t tell who was in charge in Yemen, why should the American People trust them on Iran?

If the White House couldn’t tell the American People where Barack Obama was the night of the Benghazi attack was or what he was doing, why should be trust them now on the Iran Deal?

If the White House couldn’t tell us when they are wrong, and they often are, why should the American People believe that this time they know what they are doing?

If the White House couldn’t tell a small dictator in Syria that he needed to stop gassing his own people, why should we believe that the Iranians will take any sanctions seriously when they build a Nuclear Bomb.  Or use it!

If the White House couldn’t tell what the rule of the office of the President and Secretary of state are when it comes to Treaties that will affect the world, why shouldn’t the Congress work to impeach this President?   Before the Damage is beyond the “red line”.

FCC’s Net Neutrality Vote

In Government Reforms on February 26, 2015 at 4:28 pm

FCC’s Net Neutrality Vote means I’m from the Government and I’m here to help.  Or Bribes are us, yes with this vote and control now the feds will have the ability to take care of their friends.  Alot like Obamacare where some healthcare providers get better treatment than the others.  Yes full Federal control is on the way.

The proposed rules are pretty lengthy, but from an FCC fact sheet, here are the three things that the rules would ban that matter most to consumers:

No Blocking: broadband providers may not block access to legal content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.

No Throttling: broadband providers may not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.

No Paid Prioritization: broadband providers may not favor some lawful Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration — in other words, no ‘fast lanes.’ This rule also bans ISPs from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.”
FCC’s Net Neutrality Vote gives us all that sense that all hope is lost.  Soon the Feds will have the ability to decide what you should be reading on an open internet.  Just like Alibaba in China only “Approved” sites will be loaded.  The republicans are not going to work to stop it and the democrats already love it so you know there is nothing here that will help the average person.

Let the Bribes begin!

 

Whats the Problem with Nurse Practitioners?

In Government Reforms, Health care, Obama on February 4, 2015 at 11:54 pm

Whats the Problem with Nurse Practitioners?  Today’s counterpoint in Investors Business Daily is a telling problem.  IBD ran a rebuttal by Joy Kiviat a new graduate in a fine profession who would like us to believe that because of Nurse Practitioners medicine is now better than before.   You remember before, when you saw a Doctor not a PA.  The doctor had 8 years plus of college and had served a residency where he was exposed to all sorts of problems.  Now the initials on the jacket usually read PA.  An assistant…

Ms Kiviat writes:

“As a newly graduated family nurse practitioner, I am fully aware of what I have to offer my patients and also of the limitations to my knowledge.

I take thorough medical and personal histories on my patients, treat and manage those conditions that are appropriate given my training and experience, and refer patients to specialists when I recognize that their needs are outside my scope.”

 

Wow, Congratulations Ms Kiviat on your hard work and great degree in an honorable profession.  However, years ago it took a Registered Nurse 4 year of schooling to assist a doctor in an office or hospital.  Now is less than 3 years you no longer need a physician in the room?

I know you feel that PA’s have worked hard to fill the void but lets be honest, “You don’t know, what you don’t Know”.  And No you are not yet “FULLY AWARE” of your inabilities because they have yet to become known. No one is perfect and yours will as is many in the medical profession cost lives and do damage.  Doctors also face this, but youth allows for over abundance of confidence.   Yes, there are a variety of medical procedures that you can fill, take care of and diagnose.  But where did it become the law of the land, When was it decided the PA was going to be my primary care giver?  OBAMA CARE!  That’s when it was decided that your 3 years of schooling would become my care.  Well, hospitals now have PA’s as the front guard to Nero Surgeons, Cardiologist and other difficult specialists all front loaded with PA’s on the front lines. Adding cost in my eye’s as these sweet, newbies attempt to see if they can guess what the doctor might say is wrong.  As we have added 30 million new uninsured who have never paid in, I’m not sure why I need another layer of well trained (3 years) PA’s in front of my Doctor and Specialist.

The solution for both of us is,  OBAMA CARE to offer free medical care.  Lets put PA’s in every Walmart free of charge to the patients.  Now the hard working PA’s can help the very people OBAMA CARE promised to take care of, the Uninsured. When you find something that a PA can’t cure, they could be sent onto the hospital or physician.    If each Walmart was offering PA’s in their capacity as a medical professional the GOP and the Democrats could get behind a health care system that would offer front line protection for many more Americans.  This would be a Free Service provided by the Federal Government to get the lines out of the Private Hospital and Emergency Rooms.  Most people need advise and medical assistance.  Ms Kiviat is trained and willing to be that professional offering that service, lets give her this chance where it belongs, to the people.

Your column in IBD did less to sway me towards your heartfelt argument than it did to make many of us scream at whats wrong with the entire PA system.  We need many health care providers and may you and your fully trained associates become the best medical service you can be.  But not all of us,  wish to give up our options.

There two links to find the original print.  Thank you IBD for giving Betsy McCaughey a voice.

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials-counterpoint/020315-737670-nurse-practitioners-capable-health-care-providers.htm

Statesman is the word of the day

In Government Reforms on January 5, 2015 at 6:23 pm

Statesman is the word of the Day:112th Congress Convenes On Capitol Hill

 

These Congressmen offering themselves as conservative alternatives to Speaker Boehner are Reps. Ted Yoho and Congressman Louie Gohmert:  Statesman is the word of the day!  With choice comes discussion.  From open discussion comes options and new ideas.  Speaker Boehner has not offered choices or real options.  Call and let your Congressman or Congresswomen know your choice today.

Statesman is the word of the Day: These men have put themselves on the line, the Republican machine will seek to punish them if they are not successful.   They will find bills they try to pass, blocked by committee, they will not be given assignments on committees that are beneficial to their districts if they are unsuccessful.   Show your support and Call your Congress man today.

The following is a reprint from Congressman Louie Gohmert

“Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) released the following statement today regarding his decision to buck the status quo and challenge John Boehner in the race for House Speaker:

“After the November elections gave Republicans control of the Senate, voters made clear they wanted change.  There have been numerous examples of problematic Republican leadership, but we were hopeful our leaders got the voters’ message. However, after our Speaker forced through the CRomnibus by passing it with Democratic votes and without time to read it, it seemed clear that we needed new leadership. There had been much discussion. But, until yesterday, no one had stepped up.

I applaud my friend Rep. Ted Yoho for putting his name forward as an alternative to the status quo. Ted is a good man for whom I could vote, but I have heard from many supporters and also friends in Congress who have urged me to put forward my name for Speaker as well to increase our chances of change. That is why I am also offering my name as a candidate for Speaker.

There is false information being floated that any Republican candidates in addition to the current Speaker will split the vote and give the Speaker’s gavel to Congresswoman Pelosi. This is nothing but a scare tactic to keep the current regime in power.

As long as Republicans vote for an adult American citizen for Speaker, no Democrat can win. Only if 59 Republicans voted “Present” would there be a chance for a Democrat to win.

To win the Speaker’s race, an adult American citizen has to get a clear majority of all Members of Congress on the House floor voting for an eligible person.  Voting “Present” simply reduces the number of votes required to win a majority. If no one wins a majority on the first ballot, then we go to a second vote, then a third, until someone gets a majority.

At this point, the Speaker’s election is not about a particular candidate. It is about whether we keep the status quo or make the change the country demands. I am putting forward my name for consideration as Speaker and hope that with a new Speaker, be that me or someone else, we can fight for the ideals and principles that the voters wanted when they elected us in November.”

Congressman Gohmert is the Vice Chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security. Prior to being elected to serve in Congress, Louie was elected to three terms as District Judge in Smith County, Texas. He was appointed by Texas Governor Rick Perry to complete a term as Chief Justice of the 12th Court of Appeals”

http://gohmert.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398171

Statesman is the word of the day

Reprinted from Congressman Ted Yoho:

In a daring move just days before the next election for House speaker, Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla., today offered himself as an alternative to incumbent Speaker John Boehner, the party establishment’s choice.

Boehner, who has served as speaker since 2011, will likely face his first formal challenge from a member of his own party on Tuesday when lawmakers convene for the 114th Congress. The Daily Signal has learned Yoho is one of several Republicans weighing a run for speaker.

“The American people have allowed us to choose who is best suited to lead the House by electing a deep bench of diverse and qualified members,” Yoho said in a Facebook message. “Our Republic is built on choice, and if needed, I would stand up to give our members that option.”

A formal challenge to Boehner sets up different dynamic than two years ago when a dozen conservative lawmakers cast protest votes against the Ohio Republican even though there were no other declared candidates. Now, Yoho gives Republicans an option besides Boehner.

In a statement provided to The Daily Signal tonight, Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said, “Rep. Boehner was selected as the House Republican Conference’s choice for speaker in November, and he expects to be elected by the whole House next week.”

In order to retain the speakership, Boehner will need 218 votes—a majority of House members. That means no more than 29 Republicans can defect.

Democrats will nominate Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California as their candidate for speaker. But unless Republicans abstain or cast their votes for Pelosi, she will be unable to reach a majority. Republicans outnumber Democrats 246 to 188 following the resignation of New York Republican Michael Grimm last week.

The U.S. Constitution allows for the election of a House speaker at the beginning of each Congress. The winning candidate needs a majority—not plurality—to be elected.

For conservatives to deny Boehner a majority, Yoho or other GOP members—some of whom might not announce their intentions until Tuesday—would need the support of at least 29 fellow Republicans. If Boehner fails to achieve a majority on the first ballot, the House would continue to vote on subsequent ballots until a winner has a majority.

Yoho was first elected to Congress in 2012 to represent northern Florida after narrowly defeating long-time Rep. Cliff Stearns in the Republican primary. He cruised to victory that November and was re-elected last year. He has a Heritage Action score of 72 percent.

This week, two Republicans publicly signaled their opposition to Boehner: Reps. Jim Bridenstine of Oklahoma and Thomas Massie of Kentucky released statements over the past two days saying they wouldn’t support Boehner.

“The CR/omnibus legislation sufficiently undermines the checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution that it warrants my pending vote against the speaker,” Bridenstine wrote for The Daily Signal. “John Boehner went too far when he teamed with Obama to advance this legislation. He relinquished the power of the purse, and with it he lost my vote.”

Bridenstine praised Yoho for offering himself as an alternative to Boehner.

“The idea that John Boehner and Nancy Pelosi are the only two alternatives is incorrect,” Bridenstine said. “Now we have a real choice. Members must decide if they are for the status quo or for a change in direction.”

Massie, meanwhile, cited “dysfunction” under Boehner’s watch as the reason for his opposition to the Ohio Republican.

“My constituents expect better and America deserves better,” Massie wrote in a statement. “I will vote for a new speaker who will consistently articulate a constitutional vision for America and facilitate an inclusive and orderly legislative process that allows Congress to truly reflect the will of the people.”

Several other Republicans, including six who were elected in November, voiced support for an alternative to Boehner during their campaigns. They include Reps.-elect Glenn Grothman of Wisconsin, Jody Hice and Barry Loudermilk of Georgia, Gary Palmer of Alabama, John Ratcliffe of Texas, and Mark Walker of North Carolina.

In addition to Bridenstine and Massie, other Republicans opposed Boehner for speaker two years ago. Those currently still in the House include Reps. Justin Amash of Michigan, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Tim Huelskamp of Kansas, Walter Jones of North Carolina, and Steve Pearce of New Mexico. Yoho also opposed Boehner in 2013.

Two other Republican lawmakers, Reps. Raul Labrador of Idaho and Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina, voted present in 2013.

Last year, The Hill identified at least three others who could oppose Boehner: Reps. Paul Gosar and Matt Salmon of Arizona, and Steve King of Iowa.

Statesman is the word of the day: call and let your voice be heard.  Options and views in an open democracy.

Change we can believe in?

In Government Reforms, Obama, Terrorists on December 24, 2014 at 4:13 pm

Change we can believe in?  Where is the indignation?

Change we can believe in apparently now involves targeting the hero’s who put their lives on the line to keep this country safe, free and a country of laws. Where did my country go?

In November, Robert O’Neill appeared on Fox News Channel to discuss his role in the raid that killed bin Laden on May 1, 2011 in Abbotabad.  So now the United States Government is going to investigate if he committed a crime?  Disclosed national secrets? The photo of the protected leaders watching a video screen worried that things would go wrong, went viral.  The lives of the men of seal team six were on the minds of family, friends and according to accounts we “American Citizens” were allowed to hear or read, those brave soldiers thought they were on a suicide mission.  Were any of us worried about the political lives of the elected officials?  Safety seated at a conference table inside a secured bunker in the White House.  Protected by secret service, capital police, the entire military, FBI, Washington Police Department, and what ever other protective measures offered to the Washington Elite.  The thought struck me then, of not revenge but the idea that harming the United States will be punished.  911 would not stand as an action by a group.  War will result in war. Freedom is costly.  Seal team six as President Obama exposed in his victory lap about how “We Got Him” were the men who were willing to put their own lives on the line to protect our reputation from harm.  To insure other would be terrorist that this will not stand.

Change we can believe in? The hardest part of the new “change” has been that the continuity of the United States Government is a mess.  What do we believe in?  Dictators?  I’m now told that 50 years of not talking to a Communist who once aimed Nuclear Missiles at my country is no longer a good idea.  The Castro’s have  never been nice to my country or according to free Cubans good to their people as well.  But now I’m told that it’s better to befriend them.  Change we can believe in?

My government told me that Benghazi was caused by a really bad movie that caused a group to want to kill an Ambassador that begged for more security.  He was denied that privilege by someone, who’s name I will probably never really know.  But Somehow the Soldier who was willing to fly into enemy territory to seek revenge on a known bad guy is under investigation.  Change we can believe in?  I think not.

When a thief of whom I have seen the theft on video and don’t need political commentary.  Attacks a police officer in his car, and is shot during the officers defense of his own life, is the reason for burning down the town of Ferguson, but I’m told by my President it was because he was black makes me wonder if this is, Change we can believe in?

No longer is many school districts is a child of color allowed to be expelled.  The teacher may be bullied, the other students might not have the opportunity to learn that days subject because the race is now the primary issue, not the actions.

The IRS has spent millions of American Tax payer money protecting emails from it’s own employees and stalling congress yet the government has the ability to investigate one lone soldier?

Change we can believe in?  North Korea is now embolden to attack a US company and destroy free speech.  President Obama didn’t condemn North Korea as much as he attacked the leaders of Sony about their decision.  Some change!

Details of the raid were confirmed by U.S. officials shortly after it occurred. The raid itself was dramatized in the 2012 movie “Zero Dark Thirty.” With private briefings for the director by the Administration.  National Security?  Freedom?  Desk Jobs.

Change we can believe in?  Robert O’Neill, was willing to give his life to seek an end to the Osama Bin Laden Story.  He won.  Americans can not let this story become about punishing the victors.  Why would any soldier be willing to offer up his life or liberty to an America that is willing to break the back of a political system.  Courts, Lawyers, Private Protection, and his own personal safety. What is happening?  Where are the checks and balances?  Patriots?

Change we can believe in? President Obama should be honoring Seal Team Six and Robert O’Neill, not allowing him to become a metaphor of intimidation by a federal government.

Change we can believe in? Our collective freedoms matter, and must be protected.  It requires a collective America.  One that respects its freedom.  That means respecting our hero’s both living and those who gave the ultimate sacrifice.

How does the AFL-CIO know

In Executive order, Government Reforms, Health care on November 19, 2014 at 5:08 pm

The AFL-CIO accidentally sent an email to reporters Wednesday that said “there will be a prime time Thursday evening announcement” on immigration, with “a full unveiling” in Las Vegas on Friday.

Is this how the White House is releasing press statements now?

With all the children that have crossed the boarder and the new respiratory disease being linked to the spike in new arrivals, add the Ebola outbreaks this President doesn’t seem to want a break.

Hospitals in Denver are experiencing an alarming spike in a severe respiratory illness — especially among very young children and those with asthma — that may be caused by an uncommon viral pathogen.

Officials at Children’s Hospital Colorado said they have treated more than 900 children since Aug. 18 for severe respiratory illness and admitted 86 to the hospital.

Only a few more weeks till the Republicans are in control of both houses and President Obama will have to learn to get along.